  
fahtphish (Fahtphish)
| Posted on Friday, May 23, 2003 - 04:50 am: |
|
heres my friends setup |
  
fahtphish (Fahtphish)
| Posted on Friday, May 23, 2003 - 04:54 am: |
|
heres some more |
  
fahtphish (Fahtphish)
| Posted on Friday, May 23, 2003 - 04:57 am: |
|
oops, some more    |
  
fahtphish (Fahtphish)
| Posted on Friday, May 23, 2003 - 05:06 am: |
|
my friend uses the inner res. tek. dunked before EVERY flush for 24 hours. he uses dry verm. to case and by the time pinning starts the casing is moist and if not one can just give it a good misting. he believes this may cut back on contam. risks due to stale water in the casings. other than that time he doesn't mist. they don't need it. they are sitting on 2.5 in. of perlite with a piece tin foil in between the cake and the perlite. these cakes are on their second flush. my friend said that the first flush, he couldn't even see the cakes. as you can see the bins are just inside of a clear plastic bag.  faht |
  
fahtphish (Fahtphish)
| Posted on Friday, May 23, 2003 - 05:11 am: |
|
what the hell heres another couple, my friend was teasing me with that note in the second one faht
  |
  
fahtphish (Fahtphish)
| Posted on Friday, May 23, 2003 - 05:22 am: |
|
i hear these worked like a charm! faht
  |
  
Dustin (Dustin)
| Posted on Friday, May 23, 2003 - 05:26 am: |
|
just goes to show that PF tek can be alot better then casing in a tray -Dustin |
  
Highflyer (Highflyer)
| Posted on Friday, May 23, 2003 - 05:40 am: |
|
That is debateable. You would blow a load at what someone could do with 80+ cakes cased or spawned. Very nice pics though faht. I especially like the one with your name in the middle. |
  
Dustin (Dustin)
| Posted on Friday, May 23, 2003 - 05:50 am: |
|
yea true but then again i almost blew a load at these pics... -Dustin |
  
fahtphish (Fahtphish)
| Posted on Friday, May 23, 2003 - 05:53 am: |
|
true, but remeber these cakes have already "blown", lol, their load once and it was way more prolific than this, so im told, of course. and they will proly do it again and maybe even again with a milk dunk or two. but debateable was the word, faht |
|