I suppose it wouldn't be cost effective to make and sell your own line of custom DIY-style lab gear, would it? Somehow, I think there's a viable business plan in there somewhere...

Posted 18 December 2007 - 08:28 PM
Posted 19 December 2007 - 06:08 AM
depending on how thick of the uhmw is, it gets easier to cut :) on the mill it cuts like butter :) i would rather do uhmw on cnc than any old hand cranker just to keep an accurate eye on the speeds/feeds. As for lathe operations, i have been playing with it for some time now since alot of our jobs going out the door require uhmw. high speed, very high feed. as for hss for cutters, it works ok, but think more along the lines of inserts for machining aluminum, uhmw and oil filled uhmw likes sharp edge prepped inserts (uncoated). You can achieve the same results with your tin-e coated inserts, just gotta bump that feed up. i will run 2500 rpm on turning ops, with a feed no less than 15 thou per rev. (F.015) and my depth of cuts are 100 thou or greater on my g71 programming. i leave 30 thou instead of the normal 10 thou for the g70 cleanup. also, i bump up my drill and cutoff feeds to double of what u would use for CR or HR or SS steels. With the higher feeds, you wont see as much stringy wrap-up on your part, it usually shoots the stringy outta the way. I had a 10 foot high string arc coming off the manual lathe one day with high feed and it gave me the idea to use on the cnc, been doing it ever since. :)Great machining job. I hope you don't mind me asking, it might be kind of off topic. I tried machining UHMW a few times. My machines were an old Bridgeport and a 13" Cincinnati lathe. I learned old school techniques, high speed tool steel for cutters. That UHMW was not easy to machine, it didn't want to cut. How is that stuff cut these days?
Posted 19 December 2007 - 06:12 AM
yes , i have tossed the idea around. and since i keep most of the drops (excess material normally tossed away) , my costs are kept to a minimum :) however right now i am backed up 7 ways from sunday due to a couple prototype conveyors we have been building the last couple weeks. seems like our engineering dept needs a refresher course on document changes, instead of using "guesswork". Yes, i kept the proggies, so yes, you will be seeing a few more, most likely in the marketplace ;) I am deciding what to do on a couple ideas, like where to add an audio taper potentiometer, and making a quad station :)That is sweet!
I suppose it wouldn't be cost effective to make and sell your own line of custom DIY-style lab gear, would it? Somehow, I think there's a viable business plan in there somewhere...
Posted 19 December 2007 - 01:44 PM
Posted 19 December 2007 - 01:49 PM
Posted 19 December 2007 - 04:21 PM
if u can weasel 20-30ipm on your bridgeport, you will have a clean cut. speed of about 1500 :)Those old hand crankers just cannot take good advantage of the modern cutters and technology. The speeds and feeds are too slow, and without coolant and recirculation the cutters cannot be used on metals. Thanks for the generous explanation. The new stuff is just amazing, I hope the USA can remain strong in the field.
Posted 19 December 2007 - 04:38 PM
Posted 19 December 2007 - 11:03 PM
2 Rheostats, 1 for a heating element :thumbup: and the other for speed control. :headbang:
That is one kickass design :)
-feds
Posted 19 December 2007 - 11:09 PM
Posted 20 December 2007 - 07:41 AM
Posted 20 December 2007 - 09:52 AM
draw something up in paint, a quickie, of how u picture the perfect setup ;) By the way, why the rheostats and a heating element? making coffee on the other pads? lol.
Posted 20 December 2007 - 11:22 AM
Like Mycotopia? Become a member today!