Paradox
©
Fisana

Jump to content


Photo
* * * * * 6 votes

The Cactus ID Thread


  • Please log in to reply
712 replies to this topic

#701 Neptunechild

Neptunechild

    Cactus Wizard

  • OG VIP
  • 647 posts

Awards Bar:

Posted 23 June 2017 - 10:42 AM

Then I guess it's a hybrd and not Peruvianus x)
  • bozefonce likes this

#702 meyer

meyer

    Its better to burn out, than fade away...

  • OG VIP
  • 1,008 posts

Donator


Awards Bar:

Posted 23 June 2017 - 10:48 AM

Thats exactly what I was thinking also, Neptune is the one of the local experts so we know he knows what he is talking about. I am getting a lot more familiar with cacti in general as it has nearly consumed my life for the last 6 months, over 2 years of growing but its really taken over all my free time, to a delight, I love working with them!


  • bozefonce likes this

#703 bozefonce

bozefonce

    peculiar star

  • OG VIP
  • 717 posts

Donator

Posted 23 June 2017 - 11:03 AM

Is there any relatively unintrusive way to test for actives short of bioassay?

#rootbraintheory
  • meyer likes this

#704 Neptunechild

Neptunechild

    Cactus Wizard

  • OG VIP
  • 647 posts

Awards Bar:

Posted 23 June 2017 - 01:13 PM

I am just guessing...it looks a lot like my T. Peruvianus...will post a pic later.
  • bozefonce likes this

#705 meyer

meyer

    Its better to burn out, than fade away...

  • OG VIP
  • 1,008 posts

Donator


Awards Bar:

Posted 23 June 2017 - 02:07 PM

 

 

Is there any relatively unintrusive way to test for actives short of bioassay?

 

I am also very interested in any quick and easy ways to test for alkaloids and the strenght of them in various forms of cacti... does anything exist that is not something only a high-tech lab could afford???


  • bozefonce likes this

#706 meyer

meyer

    Its better to burn out, than fade away...

  • OG VIP
  • 1,008 posts

Donator


Awards Bar:

Posted 23 June 2017 - 02:58 PM

Lophophora decipiens rare cactus; kaktus kakteen cacti mammillaria - Active or Not?

 

I have heard contradicting agruements for both sides of this plant; the Magic Cactus website states "Originally described by Leon Croizat. L. Decipiens can be found near Torreon, and El Ampero, in the state of Coahuila Mexico on the top of surrounding high rocky peaks, although there hasn't ever been found any at such a location since the mentioning of this location. Said to be quite distinct from L.Williamsii by having a pronounceable ashy grey color and lacking noticeable rib formations. Instead, it has diamond shaped conical tubercles that are spiral in form similar to Strombocactus Disciformis, but with flowers the same as L.Williamsii. Mescaline and Pellotine concentrations are similar to that of L.Williamsii."

 

Please note the flower color in the second picture I got from the blog, clearly not the same as L.Williamsii.

 

While this blog states "I can only say that the plants live up to their name (decipiens meaning “deceiving"); then he goes on to site the following "Leon Croizat's description of Lophophora williamsii var. decipiens stated that the vegetative body of this variety was basally tubercled or with distinct podaria rather than ribs, and that the flower extended out of the top of the plant to a greater extent. This description was based entirely on an illustration in Britton and Rose, The Cactaceae volume 3, plate 10, figure 4 (see below). Some researchers, e.g. Anderson, have argued that these characters are not consistent enough in occurrence to justify separate taxonomic status while others, including Gerhard Köhres, state that plants corresponding to Croizat's description grow near El Amparo in the state of Coahuila, Mexico and should be counted to the Lophophora fricii complex."

 

Blog Source:  http://lophophora.bl...phora decipiens

 

So which is it, Active or not Active, cant have it both way can we?

 

Here is a picture of the Loph decipiens I am considering buying:

 

Lophophora decipiens

 

 

Loph decipiens picture from a blog flowering, note the flower resembles the color of the LW var Fricii, which is not active"

 
flowering lophophora decipiens 20090202


#707 Neptunechild

Neptunechild

    Cactus Wizard

  • OG VIP
  • 647 posts

Awards Bar:

Posted 23 June 2017 - 04:01 PM

It's a form of Fricii belonging to the Diffusa group, I would not trust the claims of activity. And I would not buy the one on the first pic, unhealthy..if it's a good price, go for it and nurse it to perfection. Namaste

Edited by Neptunechild, 23 June 2017 - 04:03 PM.

  • meyer likes this

#708 ThumbPrint

ThumbPrint

    Mycophiliac

  • Free Member
  • 15 posts

Posted 24 June 2017 - 05:24 AM

they look PC to me except for the etoliated one which is too hard to guess given its' current shape

 

I have several identical to the big, light green. you'd think they're from the same mother.

 

you know the ex has gone nasty when she takes cactus and seeds she's never going to use

 

I like how you keep them up and off the ground. Less bugs and weeds.

 

Yup thats exactly why I keep them off the ground!

 

So you think all but one are PC?

 

Love, Light & Happy Trails



#709 Neptunechild

Neptunechild

    Cactus Wizard

  • OG VIP
  • 647 posts

Awards Bar:

Posted 26 June 2017 - 06:08 PM

I am just guessing...it looks a lot like my T. Peruvianus...will post a pic later.

The promised pic...

IMG_20170624_113032.jpg

If your cacti is a active Tricho in anyform, it most probably is a peruvian torch...but if the cacti is not labled in the store, chances are bigger that it's a hybrid.



#710 pharmer

pharmer

    Mycotopiate

  • OG VIP
  • 2,617 posts

Awards Bar:

Posted 26 June 2017 - 07:28 PM

and hybrids are sumbitches to properly I.D.


  • bozefonce, Neptunechild and meyer like this

#711 pharmer

pharmer

    Mycotopiate

  • OG VIP
  • 2,617 posts

Awards Bar:

Posted 26 June 2017 - 07:29 PM

So you think all but one are PC?

 

yep

 

and it's just to soon to tell with the bent little guy


Edited by pharmer, 26 June 2017 - 07:29 PM.


#712 pharmer

pharmer

    Mycotopiate

  • OG VIP
  • 2,617 posts

Awards Bar:

Posted 26 June 2017 - 07:33 PM

RE: the photo in post 696

 

those ribs look very thin. the cactus might be dried out but it also might be a Cereus

 

Cereus are not active


  • bozefonce likes this

#713 bozefonce

bozefonce

    peculiar star

  • OG VIP
  • 717 posts

Donator

Posted 03 July 2017 - 09:05 PM

RE: the photo in post 696

those ribs look very thin. the cactus might be dried out but it also might be a Cereus

Cereus are not active

I'm pretty much convinced that it's a cereus. The sharp ribs were the one thing that bothered me most.

#rootbraintheory




Like Mycotopia? Become a member today!