It's an interesting idea that we are not "human" at all. Just dipping into that expression for the moment. I would say we're all much more, and at the same time, nothing at all.
The Case for Taking Velikovsky Seriously
Started By
Alder Logs
, Dec 03 2015 12:25 PM
43 replies to this topic
#42
Posted 12 September 2018 - 05:41 PM
I'm only fifteen minutes into this video, but Greg Jay's comments about the batshit crazy cosmologies and their black holes, big bangs, dark energy and matter; Wal Thornhill's laughing at the "ten dimensions" (there are only three, and to include time is to attempt to multiply apples times oranges) and all the mathturbatory antics of today's top cosmologists; are the same positions this dropout has come to independently.
I know I go on like a broken record here, and like Jay, I am no mathematician, but, even at that, I wish I could sit down with Jay and Thornhill and show them that huge problem that generates all the noise to signal in the sciences of cosmology and physics, which radiates both up the physical spectrum to galaxies and beyond, and down spectrum into the picture of building-block so-called particles, and the forces which are believed to bind and organize each:
Newton's Really Big Assumption:
F = G x m1 x m2 / r2
Edited by Alder Logs, 12 September 2018 - 05:48 PM.
#43
Posted 15 September 2018 - 11:31 AM
More Velikovsky readings from Greg Jay here. I read a little of Velikovsky's Saturn stuff in bits and pieces years ago. I am really appreciative of what Greg Jay has put in these two videos. No one has laid out David Talbott's vision of planetary alignments with Saturn in a way that I can make sense of yet, but I have no problem at all with envisioning Earth in orbit around Saturn whatsoever. And again, the fallout of space probes continues to pile up to support Velikovsky's vision of the natural history not being at odds with the mythological telling of our human story.
Saturn the Flood & Origin of the Oceans
The Worship of Saturn
